For Railworkers, Sick Days Weren’t the Real Issue — It Was Basic Control of Their Lives

By ramming a contract down railworkers’ throats that they had previously rejected, Joe Biden turned to a kind of authoritarianism that cemented a basic fact of American life: when you’re at work, you have no democratic rights.

Union Pacific Rail Terminals As Strike Threat Averted After Senate Votes To Impose Labor Deal

A railworker at the Union Pacific Intermodal rail terminal in Salt Lake City, Utah, on December 2, 2022. (George Frey / Bloomberg via Getty Images)


On December 2, President Joe Biden signed legislation he had requested to block an impending strike of 115,000 railroad workers, and impose the terms of a contract that a majority of those workers had voted to reject after three years of negotiations.

In so doing, he invoked the urgency of avoiding the economic catastrophe of a nationwide strike, while also touting the rejected contract he had brokered in September, saying that he had “negotiated a contract no one else can negotiate.”

The legislation may have blocked the immediate threat of a rail strike, although that remains railroad workers’ decision to make themselves. But by imposing a contract, Biden risks exacerbating the core problems that led to the current rail crisis, while further eroding a collective bargaining framework that has been crumbling for decades. The effect could be to turn US labor relations back to something closer to what they looked like in the nineteenth century.

Sorry, but this article is available to active subscribers only. Please log in or become a subscriber.