As the Fed Raises Interest Rates, People Will Lose Jobs and Democrats Will Lose Elections
The Federal Reserve has signaled that it will further raise interest rates this month, increasing the chances of a recession that will hurt average people. In response, most of the Democratic Party establishment are twiddling their thumbs.
Jerome Powell, chairman of the US Federal Reserve, during a Fed Listens event in Washington, DC, on September 23, 2022. (Al Drago / Bloomberg via Getty Images)
The Federal Reserve, as part of a broader campaign by Republican board chairman Jerome Powell to “get wages down,” is expected to increase interest rates again by 0.75 percentage points at its meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday. Doing so would put even more strain on workers and reduce consumer confidence just days before Americans head to the polls — and potentially help Powell’s GOP colleagues win back control of Congress.
While a small group of Democratic senators is pushing the Federal Reserve not to further wreck the economy one week before the midterm elections, party leaders remain silent on the matter — suggesting that top Democrats are more eager to maintain good relations with powerful corporations and the ultrarich than preserve their congressional majorities.
The Fed has repeatedly hiked interest rates to constrict wages and therefore supposedly help ease inflation. But that relief hasn’t happened, largely because the primary driver of the higher costs Americans are experiencing is markups: companies, particularly those with market power, are raising prices because they can.
Americans are facing higher prices in their daily lives and seeing their real wages rapidly decline, according to a recent Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas study. Nearly 41 percent of households are having difficulty paying their typical expenses, per the latest US Census Bureau survey data. Polls show the economy and inflation are the top issues on Americans’ minds this year, and most voters trust Republicans over Democrats to better handle these issues.
To this point, criticism of the Fed’s rate hikes has largely come from progressives like senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. With the election rapidly approaching, swing state Democratic senators Sherrod Brown of Ohio and John Hickenlooper of Colorado both sent letters last week to Powell pointing out that the Fed’s strategy of increasing costs on American families has done nothing to limit price hikes, and could cause mass job losses.
“The risk is that higher interest rates will lead us into a potential recession, hurting the middle-class workers who have not seen wage gains in decades,” wrote Hickenlooper. “A Federal Reserve overreach could crush wage increases and hurt workers who are blameless for inflation.”
Brown, for his part, wrote, “For working Americans who already feel the crush of inflation, job losses will make it much worse. We can’t risk the livelihoods of millions of Americans who can’t afford it.” He added: “Higher interest rates and borrowing costs have not led companies to bring down prices.”
On Tuesday, Democratic senators Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and Jeff Merkley of Oregon — and several House Democrats — weighed in, too, signing a letter from Warren to Powell warning that his “interest rate hikes risk slowing the economy to a crawl while failing to slow rising prices that continue to harm families.”
But besides this trickle, most Democrats have largely deferred to the Fed and Powell — a Republican renominated last year by President Joe Biden — to try to tame inflation with rate hikes. They have tacitly backed the rate increases, even though such moves primarily punish workers by increasing unemployment and reducing labor’s power, and despite overwhelming evidence that price hikes are actually being driven by corporate profiteering.
Powell Sours the Mood
Powell, a former longtime private equity executive and Republican donor, was first appointed Fed chair by President Donald Trump. He was renominated by Biden and confirmed in May with the support of all but six Democratic senators.
Under Powell’s leadership, the Fed has hiked interest rates five times this year. He has been transparent about the point of the increases: He wants to “get wages down” and “bring some pain to households and businesses,” with the idea being that this will help drive down prices.
There is no evidence that the rate hikes are doing much, if at all, to limit inflation. Indeed, corporate giants continue to report staggering profits, even as many other contributing factors to inflation have subsided.
The continued rate hikes could instead be a boon to Powell’s allies in corporate America, both by increasing unemployment and reducing the risk of unionization, and putting his fellow Republicans into power on Capitol Hill.
Polls show increasing frustration with a slowing economy, induced by Powell’s earlier rate hikes, and that voters whose biggest priority is the economy favor Republicans over Democrats by a two-to-one margin.
Powell’s rate hikes are “certainly bad news for the Democrats. If I were a Dem official, I would be very very unhappy with the Fed,” said J. W. Mason, a professor of economics at John Jay College. “I think people underestimate how political the Fed is. The administration probably does have some leverage if they chose to use it.”
The Federal Reserve has seven governors, all appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, with one designated by the president as chair and another as vice chair. The Fed pledges to aggressively seek to avoid political interference in its affairs, and as such, exercises very little transparency about what it does. Unlike essentially every other executive branch agency, official meetings of the board are closed to the public and transcripts are typically not released until five years after they are produced.
Despite the salience that the Fed’s actions have for the Democrats’ performance in the election on November 8, top Democrats have stayed mum, with the White House, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer failing to return a request for comment.
High Interest Rates, Higher Pain
The Fed’s interest rate policy is effectively zero-sum: higher interest rates equal more social pain and more economic contraction, and lower interest rates lead to easier credit and more employment.
This fact is almost never reported in corporate media, nor is the fact that higher mortgage costs are by definition inflationary. This is deliberate, because as prominent supporter of interest rate hikes and former top Obama economic aide Jason Furman noted to the Lever in July, if the choice was presented starkly, there would be effectively no political constituency pushing for higher interest rates.
“You’ll never hear someone from the Fed get up and say, we’re going to raise interest rates, that’s going to make it more costly to borrow,” Furman said on Lever Time. “That’s going to reduce business investments in our economy. And that’s the way we’re going to bring down inflation. And yet, that’s part of what they’re doing . . . if you start talking about how it works, I think it would sound bad to a lot of people.”
The Fed’s role in the economy is little understood. Effectively, the Fed determines the cost of lending for banks — not necessarily the interest rates the banks charge, but the interest rate banks receive from the central bank. Higher interest rates result in higher mortgage costs — but those higher costs are not factored into the way the Fed calculates inflation.
Whenever the Fed raises interest rates, the result will be more people out of work, because many sectors of the economy — and in particular, the home building and auto industries — are built on credit. The cheaper credit is, the more houses and cars will be built and sold.
The Fed’s actions suggest that the only inflation that really matters is workers’ real wages — not corporate profits, which have contributed about 40 percent to price growth since spring 2020, well above historical averages. Nor does the Fed meaningfully consider the growth of CEO pay, which grew 10 percent to an average of $14.4 million in 2021. The CEO-to-worker pay gap went from 181:1 in 2020 to 193:1 in 2021.
A central part of the problem facing Democrats — and likely why Pelosi and Schumer are silent about the Fed threatening their congressional majorities as rank-and-file Democrats speak up — is that all of the actual solutions to solving inflation (or more precisely, corporate price gouging) run up against powerful corporate actors who pump money into the campaigns of their powerful Democratic allies in Washington.
The only comprehensive legislation proposed to address inflation was introduced by Democratic representative Jamaal Bowman of New York in August. The bill, which would investigate price gouging and make recommendations to the president for targeted price controls, has just eighteen cosponsors.
The recent 0.75 percent hike by the Fed on September 21 was their largest rate hike prior to an election since September 1980, when the Fed, under former Chase Manhattan Bank executive Paul Volcker, raised interest rates by 1 percent, followed by an additional 1 percent hike in October of that year.
That election resulted in Jimmy Carter losing forty-four states to a man who was considered too extreme for the Republican Party nomination just four years before, and Republicans winning control of the Senate for the first time in twenty-eight years.
The highlights of the Reagan years — the firing of eleven thousand union air traffic controllers, the nuclear brinkmanship, the Wall Street craze, and heightened inequality — can in many ways be attributed to the decisions made by Volcker and the Fed.
Powell referred to Volcker this spring as “the greatest economic public servant of the era.”
“The Fed prides itself on being an independent entity,” said Samir Sonti, a professor of urban studies at the City University of New York who is writing a book on the Fed. “It guards its independence very jealously. It’s clear that everything it does has political implications. That’s not lost on the very smart people who run the Federal Reserve. I’m not going to claim to know a political design by Jay Powell, but it seems to me that he must understand the potential political consequences of doing what he’s doing and when he’s doing it.”
He continued, “What’s so alarming is that a generally undemocratic institution has the ability to effect such significant harm on the global economy . . . If there’s anything that calls for democratic control and accountability, it is this.”