Atomic Abundance and Its Enemies

Wrangling over the construction of nuclear power in New York State has revealed the priorities of some of the state’s biggest environmental lobbies. For them, creating bureaucratic procedures they can oversee is more important than building clean energy.

Billion-Dollar Clean Hydrogen Plan On Hold As US Weighs Rules

A cooling tower at the Constellation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station in Scriba, New York, on Tuesday, May 9, 2023. (Lauren Petracca / Bloomberg via Getty Images)


On a hot Monday morning last June, standing in front of the Niagara hydroelectric station in Upstate New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul spoke of the future. Once the industrial home of titans like General Electric, IBM, and Kodak, the bustling manufacturing basin of Upstate fell into decline in the 1970s when those titans chased lower wages offshore. “Hard-working families across Upstate,” Hochul said, “were left wondering, what is our future?”

Now Gov. Hochul wants to deliver exactly that — a future for Upstate New York — in the form of reindustrialization: advanced manufacturing for products like semiconductors. Such manufacturing facilities, though, “don’t run on dreams — they need to be powered, they need a lot of electricity,” she explained. Indeed, new manufacturing planned in the wake of Biden-era policies is increasing electricity demand across the country.

“So to power New York’s future, we need three things: reliability, affordability, and sustainability,” Hochul said. She had a specific solution in mind, one that blue-state liberals like her have all but consigned to the past: nuclear energy. The state would be returning to the power of the atom, thirty-seven years after its last nuclear unit was built, and four years after her predecessor in Albany closed one of the state’s four plants. It’s a seismic shift in New York State energy policy.

Sorry, but this article is available to active subscribers only. Please log in or become a subscriber.