The UAW Is Betting That Autoworkers Are Ready to Organize

With its recently announced drive to organize nonunion automakers, the UAW is tackling the legacy of previous failures to organize the South. The union is wagering that the momentum of its Big Three strike will allow it to win where it’s fallen short before.

BIZ-AUTO-UAW-STRIKE-TB

United Auto Workers president Shawn Fain gestures in solidarity with striking workers during a rally at UAW Local 551 on October 7, 2023, in Chicago. (John J. Kim / Chicago Tribune / Tribune News Service via Getty Images)


Fresh off their contract victories against the Big Three US automakers, late last month the new leadership of the United Auto Workers (UAW) announced a bold campaign to organize all thirteen nonunion automakers in the United States. This includes more than 150,000 workers at Japanese, Korean, and German “transplants” like Toyota, Kia, and Volkswagen, along with domestic electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers like Tesla and Rivian. Already, the campaign seems to be getting results, with 30 percent of Volkswagen workers at a plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, announcing that they had signed cards in support of their union within the first week.

This is one of the most exciting organizing drives we’ve seen in the United States in decades. If successful, it would rebuild union power and raise standards in the critical manufacturing sector while establishing a beachhead in the largely nonunion South. It also provides a test of a risky organizing strategy that hearkens back to how the modern US labor movement first built itself.

The Importance of Manufacturing

Not since the push to organize basic industry in the 1930s and ’40s have we seen a move to organize in the manufacturing sector at this scale. That’s important because, contrary to common narratives about deindustrialization and the decline of manufacturing, the sector remains a vitally important part of the US economy. Manufacturing still contributed 10.3 percent of value added to GDP in 2022, as compared to 8.4 percent for education, health care, and social assistance, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Sorry, but this article is available to active subscribers only. Please log in or become a subscriber.