Wall Street Doesn’t Have to Rule Our Cities

Destin Jenkins

Municipal bonds once allowed cities to quickly fundraise for important infrastructure and public housing projects. We should organize against today’s system of bondholder supremacy, which enables investors to extract tax-free profits from communities.

A sign for Wall Street in Manhattan, New York. (Vlad Lazarenko / Wikimedia Commons)


When cities raise money through bonds, they become indebted to bondholders. In the late nineteenth century, cities had the upper hand over their creditors; by the New Deal era, bondholders had become more powerful. But some investors still valued the interests of communities, funding a massive expansion of schools, infrastructure, and public housing.

Today, bondholders reign supreme. Through ratings agencies and high interest rates, they have found ways to profit off hollowed-out housing projects, white flight, and even the riots that swept segregated cities during the 1960s.

The historian Destin Jenkins wants us to see that this situation is not natural: a small “fraternity” of financiers worked to insulate the bond market from public input and appoint themselves its technocratic overlords. Jenkins historicizes bondholder supremacy in The Bonds of Inequality: Debt and the Making of the American City. His book focuses on San Francisco, a city that built a progressive political culture and avoided the ravages of deindustrialization — yet nevertheless became incredibly segregated and unequal, in part because of the bond market.

Sorry, but this article is available to active subscribers only. Please log in or become a subscriber.